I’m just back from a whirlwind four-week North American tour of Toronto (the International Studies Association annual meeting), Santa Barbara (speaking to an interdisciplinary ‘Sea Change‘ seminar at UCSB), Tallahassee (reconnecting with, and disconnecting from, my former life at Florida State), Tampa (the Association of American Geographers annual meeting), and Cambridge (a pair of lectures at Harvard’s Graduate School of Design). Along the way, I had a bit of downtime in Florida and New York, broke my toe (vacuuming my parents’ apartment), got lectured about the Spratly Islands by the Filipino proprietors of my B&B in Toronto, spent a day in the Tampa General Hospital Emergency Room (this had nothing to do with the toe; I was shepherding a dazed British colleague through the U.S. healthcare system), had a long make-up coffee with my marine sparring partner Gaston Gordillo, had a chance encounter outside a restaurant in Cambridge with Cynthia Enloe and Joni Seager, caught up with old friends Mary Burke and Sergio Fagherazzi, made lots of new friends, got ‘criticised’ in an author-meets-the-critics session, chaired an awesome session by feminist political geographer (and my Durham colleague) Rachel Pain, and narrowly avoided an awkward moment where I almost ended up lecturing John Agnew about Italian politics.
Amidst it all, and just in time for the author-meets-the-critics session, I received an image of the book cover (and dust-flap text) for Contesting the Arctic, my forthcoming book — coauthored with Jeremy Tasch and Hannes Gerhardt — on ‘politics and imaginaries in the circumpolar north’. The cover looks stunning, if I may say so myself (click the image for a full-size version). The book won’t be published until September, but in the meantime you can fill out this form to receive an email notifying you when it becomes available.
Anthropologist Gaston Gordillo has posted an intriguing essay on his Space and Politics blog about how we might think with an ‘Oceanic Void’. I don’t fully agree with his deployment of the ‘Void’ concept (see my comments, as well as those of Steve Mentz, and hopefully others who will join the discussion), but it’s a provocative discussion starter.
Although the academic in me intuitively focuses on the 5 percent that I don’t like, 95 percent of the essay is really, really good. I look forward to publication of the complete chapter.
In a new post on TheConversation.com, I revisit an old research topic of mine: the political signification of internet domain names with reference to changing modalities of state territory:
Domain name expansion signals political shift of internet
By Philip Steinberg, Durham University
The International Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers has begun rolling out what could eventually become more than 1,000 new generic top-level domain names – the part of an internet address that comes after the “dot”. It’s a move that will change how the internet as we know it looks and feels and has significant political implications to boot.
Read the full article at The Conversation.
Its been a good week for getting old projects out of the publishing houses and into the public domain.
I’m just back from a weekend in London that was a surprisingly coherent exploration into the intersections of art, politics, protest, mobility, and the ocean.
The initial component – and the thing that brought me to London in the first place – was a symposium co-sponsored by Birkbeck College’s Institute for the Humanities, Birkbeck’s Institute for the Moving Image, and Delta Arts. The conference – The Ship of Empty Boxes: Responses to Containerised Global Trade – was, in large part, an extended reflection on Allan Sekula’s and Noël Burch’s The Forgotten Space. A central question asked throughout the conference was whether some of the elusive but fundamental concepts and spaces that bind the maritime world economy are amenable to representation. And if so, how can they be depicted in a way that illustrates both global connections and embodied experiences?
Continue Reading »
The video of my plenary lecture at the October 2013 Arctic Circle conference has now been posted. In this talk, I argue for the territorial sea option as a ‘middle route’ through the Northwest Passage.
Notwithstanding Ambassador Hedberg’s introduction, I am proposing that the Northwest Passage be classified as Canada‘s territorial sea, not the US’. The lecture was presented at the inaugural meeting of the Arctic Circle group, a meeting that I’ve written about previously.
An expanded version of the talk will be published in Ocean Development & International Law in February 2014.