I was saddened to learn of the death of Ray Milefsky, one of the most prominent and engaging individuals in the international boundary community. I didn’t know Ray well (I think I met him three times in my life), but he was the sort of person who made a lasting impression. So, Martin Pratt’s moving tribute on his Bordermap blog has compelled me to add my own contribution to Ray’s memory.
As Martin notes, Ray was a long-time employee of the US State Department’s Office of the Geographer and Global Issues, where he was a leading expert in boundary and sovereignty matters. In that role, he was a steady friend of IBRU and a frequent tutor at IBRU training workshops. Although a consummate professional, Ray somehow had the air and enthusiasm of a brilliant amateur, a man who seemed always surprised by his knowledge…and delighted by it. And he shared that delight with others, bringing energy to all those around him. It is perhaps a cliche to call someone ‘full of life’ (and, I suppose, it’s a bit of an oxymoron in an obituary), but I can’t think of a better way to describe Ray. Continue Reading »
For the past few days my little corner of the Internet has been filled with reflections on the just released Stern report on the UK’s Research Excellence Framework (REF). To keep things simple for non-UK readers, REF is an assessment exercise held every five to seven years that the UK government uses to allocate block grants to universities. Not surprisingly, then, universities are always looking for ways to score high on REF and thereby maximise funding. [Actually, I think REF’s influence is disproportionate to the funding that it allocates, but that’s another issue.]
I have to admit that my first reaction when I saw Lord Stern’s recommendations were that if these had been in place four years ago I might not have gotten my current job! Two of the points made by the department to the university to justify my hire were that I would bring publications with me (for the 2014 REF) and that I would provide a means for tying research to an Impact Case Study (for the anticipated 2021 REF). Stern recommends that the former be eliminated and that the latter be deemphasised.
Continue Reading »
Political Geography is pleased to announce the latest addition to the editorial team: Tor Benjaminsen of the Norwegian University of Life Sciences, who has joined the journal as an associate editor. Tor will be replacing James Sidaway, who is stepping aside after over a decade with the journal. James will be winding down the articles that he’s currently working on, with plans to leave the journal by the end of the year.
Tor, whose research interests range from the political drivers and impacts of soil loss in the Sahel to notions of “green governmentality” to Sami reindeer herding in Finnmark, brings an expertise in political ecology and environment-development politics to the journal. Additionally, his fluency in French (as well as Norwegian) and his extensive research in Africa should help expand Political Geography beyond the Anglo-American tradition. We’re delighted to have him join the journal and look forward to the many contributions that he’ll be making over the coming years.
I’m presently en route to what promises to be a truly inspiring week at UC-Irvine, where Liz DeLoughrey and Lisa Paravisini-Gebertis are leading a week-long interdisciplinary seminar of ocean theorists to workshop works-in-progress on how we think of, with, on, and about the ocean as well as its human and more-than-human ecologies. In the spirit of things, I’m writing this blog post somewhere over the Atlantic, to be uploaded when I land in Newark (or later, in Irvine, if the layover is rushed).
Reading through some of the pre-circulated drafts, it appears that a central theme likely to emerge this week will be questions of ocean (in)visibility. Sight has long had a privileged role in structuring how we understand our planet and its processes, but vision of marine space is frequently confounded by the ocean’s volume as well as its darkness. Even as knowledge of earth systems and global economic flows lead us to understand the concept of a world ocean, and even as the sea remains a productive platform for envisioning futures (both of which are themes explored in a number of the working papers and supplementary articles that I’ve just been reading), the sea remains a difficult place for us to visualise in its wholeness. I’m only half way through the workshop papers, but I think it’s fair to say, at this point, that each of the contributors either writes directly about or attempts to confront the problems inherent in conceiving of the ocean as a space of vision (in every sense of the word). Continue Reading »
I’m just back from a fascinating workshop at the University of Utrecht’s Law School that joined leading thinkers in international law with Israeli artists Ruti Sela and Maayan Amir. The blend of international law with art theory was right down my alley, and I presented a ‘greatest hits’ paper that re-examined several past research topics – legal ontologies of ice, seasteading, Grotius, the Mavi Marmara interdiction – with a focus on representations of extraterritory.
Continue Reading »
Political Geography is looking for a new associate editor, to begin this July. The position, made possible by James Sidaway stepping down after 12 years as associate editor, is broadly worded to cover the breadth of the subdiscipline. However we will look especially favourably on associate editor candidates with expertise in political theory and critical IR/security studies or political ecology, regardless of their disciplinary foundation, as well as candidates who expertise outside the English-language tradition.
For more details, please see the full announcement.
Please note that applications are due no later than 1 May 2016.
I’m wrapping up what I think is my 25th anniversary AAG meeting today (although I missed 3 or 4 of them over the years, since Miami in 1991) and its been a slightly strange one. I’m not sure if it’s because the conference has been spread across four hotels, or because I’m coming off the intense high of a week-long field trip to Jerusalem with my Territory & Geopolitics class, or because I still haven’t gotten over the 11-time-zone jet lag from the aforementioned field trip, or because San Francisco is an increasingly dystopian city, or just because I’m jaded by the AAG scene. But, for whatever reason, its been an oddly unintense conference. I’m not saying the conference has been disappointing; it’s just that, for me at least, its lacked some of the usual intensity. And this is so despite my having seen some excellent papers and my having had some wonderful conversations with past, present, and future students, mentors, co-authors, and new friends. Continue Reading »