Leave a comment

Materiality and oceans…from a totally different angle

While I’ve long been interested in the materiality of the oceans and the ways in which this materiality is communicated and reproduced through both symbols and practices (e.g. maps, laws, etc.), to date I’ve never really thought about the materiality of the symbols that perform these laws.

Screen Shot 2015-10-31 at 11.19.30

This recent video link from the New York Times, sent to me by Ariell Ahearn, raises these issues. The core question asked here — “What is a flag?” — seems to echo other seemingly arcane but actually quite legally and semiotically significant questions that have been asked over the past few decades, including “What is an island?” and “What is a bridge?”. The judge’s conclusion in this particular case — that a flag needs to be clearly visible, since its purpose is to communicate sovereignty —  is certainly significant for the Ecuadorean drug smugglers being charged. But perhaps in the long term the case’s greatest impact is to remind us that the sea is an assemblage of materialities whose meanings are continually being (re)produced through interactions of laws, practices, and symbolic references.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: