3 Comments

Arctic seabed claims and the politics of mapping

Following up on my recent blogpost on Russia’s Arctic seabed claim, The Conversation has published a companion piece on some of the politics surrounding the IBRU Arctic map, its drawing, and its reception. The Conversation article integrates analysis of some of the recent (manufactured) controversy surrounding the Russian claim with reflections that I made earlier this year on the map’s seven-year history. Screen Shot 2015-08-14 at 11.42.29

For more on Russia’s recent claim and what it means (and doesn’t mean), see also this recent article in the New Scientist by the map’s designer, Martin Pratt.

Advertisements

3 comments on “Arctic seabed claims and the politics of mapping

  1. Reblogged this on Progressive Geographies and commented:
    Phil Steinberg on Arctic seabed claims and the politics of mapping.

  2. Reblogged this on rhulgeopolitics and commented:
    Phil Steinberg ruminates on recent events relating to the 2015 Russian resubmission regarding outer continental shelves in the Arctic Ocean and a well known IBRU map…..

  3. […] been thinking a lot lately about the ways in which our visualisations escape us, and this issue came to a head yesterday when students in my Critical Cartography seminar at Durham […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: